Back to Search Results

7/1/2016

Monochorionic Twins

Author: Sharon L. Seidel, MD

Mentor: Julie A. DeCesare, MD
Editor: Tiffany A. Moore Simas, MD, MPH, Med

Registered users can also download a PDF or listen to a podcast of this Pearl.
Log in now, or create a free account to access bonus Pearls features.

In the United States, twin gestation is no longer a rare event due to the increase in maternal age at conception and the increase in use of assisted reproductive technology.  Twin gestation comprises 3% of all live births; only 20% are monochorionic. Regarding amnionicity, nearly all are diamniotic; monoamniotic twinning is rare. The natural incidence of monochorionic/monoamniontic twins is 1 in 10,000; however the incidence may be increased for women undergoing IVF using zona manipulation.

The risk for fetal and neonatal mortality and long-term morbidity in monochorionic twins is significantly higher than dichorionic twins, with a 3- fold to 4-fold increase in intrauterine demise.   Shared circulation due to placental vascular anastomoses increases the risk of intrauterine demise.  Complications unique to monochorionic twins include twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS), and twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence. Major structural anomalies are more frequently diagnosed in monochorionic twins and can negatively impact the outcome of the co-twin.

Early diagnosis of chorionicity and amnionicity is made with ultrasonography. Accuracy is highest when ultrasound is performed in the first or early second trimester.  If two placentas or differing fetal sex is seen on ultrasound, then the pregnancy must be dichorionic.  If only one placenta is seen, the presence of an extension of chorionic tissue into the inter-twin membrane suggests dichorionicity.  This is referred to as the twin peak or lambda sign.  The absence of an extension of chorionic tissue into the inter-twin membrane suggests monochorionicity.  The absence of an inter-twin membrane suggests monoamnionicity.

Given higher risk of developing complications, once a diagnosis of monochorionicity has been established, ultrasound surveillance usually begins at 16 weeks gestation and is performed every 2 weeks until delivery.  This close monitoring of amniotic fluid and the presence of fluid in each twin’s bladder can help to diagnose TTTS.  Middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery Doppler studies are crucial for diagnosing TAPS and surveilling IUGR.  Growth assessment should occur every 3 to 4 weeks.  A detailed anatomic survey is recommended to assess for anomalies. Fetal echocardiogram should be performed at 18-22 weeks gestation because monochorionicity carries an odds ratio of almost 3.5 for congenital heart disease.

Monochorionic/diamniotic twins should be delivered between 34 and 37 6/7 weeks of gestation with consideration of presence/absence of complications, and risks/benefits of delivery versus expectant management. Route of delivery is determined by fetal presentation and routine obstetric factors.

The monochorionic/monoamniotic twins have a perinatal mortality risk as high as 80%, mainly due to cord entanglement.  Although optimal management remains unknown, it has become standard of care to offer inpatient management starting at 24 to 28 weeks gestation.  These patients typically undergo daily fetal surveillance, regular growth assessment, and delivery between 32 to 34 weeks gestation by cesarean.

Because preterm delivery is more likely for twins, and recommended for monoamniotic twins, antenatal corticosteroids may be considered as early as 23 weeks of gestation if delivery is anticipated within 7 days and if desired by the patient after discussion of the risks associated with periviable delivery. In the event that delivery does not occur after the first course of corticosteroids, a single dose of rescue corticosteroids may be considered if the patient is less than 34 weeks of gestation, at least 7 days have passed since the first course of corticosteroids, and delivery is anticipated within the next 7 days.

Medical complications are similar for both monochorionic and dichorionic pregnancies, and are more common than in women with singleton gestations.  Women with twins are at increased risk of hyperemesis, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders including preeclampsia, anemia, cesarean delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage.  Management of these conditions is the same as with singleton gestations.

Further Reading:

Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics; Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine.  Practice Bulletin No. 169: Multifetal Gestations: Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):e131-46. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001709.

Moldenhauer JS, Johnson MP.  Diagnosis and Management of Complicated Monochorionic Twins.  Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;58(3):632-42. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000127.

Panagiotopoulou O, Fouzas S, Sinopidis X, et al. Congenital heart disease in twins: The contribution of type of conception and chorionicity. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;218:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.029. Epub 2016 May 13.

Simpson LL.  What you need to know when managing twins: 10 key facts. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015 Jun;42(2):225-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

Initial Approval May 2016; Revised November 2017, Revised May 2019.

 

********** Notice Regarding Use ************

The Foundation for Exxcellence in Women’s Health, Inc (“Foundation”) is committed to accuracy and will review and validate all Pearls on an ongoing basis to reflect current practice.

This document is designed to aid practitioners in providing appropriate obstetric and gynecologic care. Recommendations are derived from major society guidelines and high quality evidence when available, supplemented by the opinion of the author and editorial board when necessary. It should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed.

Variations in practice may be warranted when, in the reasonable judgment of the treating clinician, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology. The Foundation reviews the articles regularly; however, its publications may not reflect the most recent evidence. While we make every effort to present accurate and reliable information, this publication is provided “as is” without any warranty of accuracy, reliability, or otherwise, either express or implied. The Foundation does not guarantee, warrant, or endorse the products or services of any firm, organization, or person. Neither the Foundation, the ABOG, SASGOG nor their respective officers, directors, members, employees, or agents will be liable for any loss, damage, or claim with respect to any liabilities, including direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages, incurred in connection with this publication or reliance on the information presented.

Copyright 2019 The Foundation for Exxcellence in Women's Health, Inc. All rights reserved.  No re-print, duplication or posting allowed without prior written consent.

 

Back to Search Results