Back to Search Results

12/1/2012

Hematoma after Delivery

Author: Theodore Barrett, MD

Editor: Timothy Klatt, MD

Registered users can also download a PDF or listen to a podcast of this Pearl.
Log in now, or create a free account to access bonus Pearls features.

Puerperal hematomas occur commonly and may pose life-threatening morbidity. Risk factors include lacerations from operative vaginal delivery/episiotomy and injury to pelvic vasculature from a variety of mechanical events including uterine evacuation or perforation.

Vulvar hematomas are often encountered postnatally.  These hematomas are a result of laceration or rupture of the pudendal artery and/or its tributaries.  Vulvar hematomas often occur in the anterior and posterior urogenital triangles in areas bound by strong fascia tissue which limits their expansion.  Deep extension of a vulvar hematoma in the anterior triangle is limited by Colles’ fascia and the urogenital diaphragm.  Similarly, deep extension of a hematoma in the posterior triangle is limited by the presence of perirectal and anal fascia.  As a result, expanding hematomas in these areas usually present as a blue-purple mass.  These hematomas are generally self-limiting however they can cause pressure necrosis of the skin.  Surgical intervention and evacuation can prevent spontaneous skin rupture.

Cervical tears, vaginal tears and a large episiotomy can rupture branches of the hypogastric arteries including the descending branch of the uterine artery, the vaginal artery and the pudendal artery.  Bleeding from these vessels can extend into the paravaginal space, which is bound superiorly by the cardinal ligament, medially by the vagina, laterally by the obturator internus muscle and inferior by muscles of the levator ani.  Hemorrhage in this area can expand medially and occlude the vagina.  Expansion can also occur cephalad in a concealed manner past the inguinal ligament into the retroperitoneal space and result in considerable blood loss.   

Retroperitoneal hematomas (RPH) are another category of rare but potentially life-threatening hemorrhage complication. The most common RPH associated with childbirth occur as a result of injury to branches of the hypogastric and ovarian vessels however lacerations to the posterior vagina such as a sulcus tear can rupture vessels, leading to hemorrhage that dissects into the utero-sacral area and expands into the retroperitoneal space.  Hematomas in the retroperitoneal space can conceal a large volume of blood due to the proximity of well-known and typically avascular areas namely the perivesical, parametrial (the base of the broad ligament) and the perirectal space.

Early recognition, evaluation and expeditious intervention can be lifesaving.  Hemodynamically unstable patients require resuscitation and surgical exploration. Similarly, patients with pressure symptoms resulting in compartment syndrome require surgical intervention.  Embolization is another management option for an expanding hematoma in an otherwise stable patient.

Further Reading:

Rogers RM, Pasic R. Pelvic Retroperitoneal Dissection: A Hands-on Primer [published correction appears in J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jul - Aug;24(5):879]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(4):546-551. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.024

 

Rafi J, Khalil H. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with retroperitoneal haematomas in pregnancy. JRSM Open. 2018;9(1):2054270417746059. Published 2018 Jan 8. doi:10.1177/2054270417746059

 

Zahn CM, Hankins GD, Yeomans ER. Vulvovaginal hematomas complicating delivery. Rationale for drainage of the hematoma cavity. J Reprod Med. 1996;41(8):569-574.

 

Initial Approval: December 2012; Revised September 2018; Previously titled “Hematoma After Delivery” – renamed to current title September 2018; Revised September 2020

 

 

********** Notice Regarding Use ************

The Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inc. (“SASGOG”) is committed to accuracy and will review and validate all Pearls on an ongoing basis to reflect current practice.

This document is designed to aid practitioners in providing appropriate obstetric and gynecologic care. Recommendations are derived from major society guidelines and high-quality evidence when available, supplemented by the opinion of the author and editorial board when necessary. It should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed.

Variations in practice may be warranted when, in the reasonable judgment of the treating clinician, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology. SASGOG reviews the articles regularly; however, its publications may not reflect the most recent evidence. While we make every effort to present accurate and reliable information, this publication is provided “as is” without any warranty of accuracy, reliability, or otherwise, either express or implied. SASGOG does not guarantee, warrant, or endorse the products or services of any firm, organization, or person. Neither SASGOG nor its respective officers, directors, members, employees, or agents will be liable for any loss, damage, or claim with respect to any liabilities, including direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages, incurred in connection with this publication or reliance on the information presented.

Copyright 2020 The Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inc. All rights reserved.  No re-print, duplication or posting allowed without prior written consent.

 

Back to Search Results