Back to Search Results

Post-pill Amenorrhea

2/1/2016 - Ahn T. Nguyen, MD

Editor: Eduardo Lara-Torre, MD

 

Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC), including combined oral contraceptives (COC), inhibit ovulation through hypothalamic-pituitary inhibition of gonadotropin secretion. Historically, it was believed that this suppression could persist for months after discontinuation of COC, leading to the syndrome of “post-pill amenorrhea.” While the name implies pill use, the issues are the same after cessation of other combined hormonal methods (contraceptive patch and ring). This syndrome was described as amenorrhea for more than one year after cessation of COC, with an approximately 1% frequency, similar to women not taking COC. When stopping cyclic COC, median duration from withdrawal bleeding to first menses is 32 days (range 15-82 days), and 98.9% have clinical evidence of normal hypothalamic-pituitary function within 90 days. Return to fertility after the completion of COC is generally similar to that observed with other common contraceptive methods, including non-hormonal contraceptive methods. Furthermore, the median time to pregnancy is 2.5 to 3 cycles, with a pregnancy rate of nearly 95% after one year.

Given the lack of evidence supporting a cause-and-effect relationship between CHC and subsequent amenorrhea, women with post-pill amenorrhea should undergo the same evaluation as any woman with secondary amenorrhea, which is defined as no menses for 3 months in patients with previously regular menstrual cycles or 6 months in patients with irregular menstrual cycles. The differential diagnosis for secondary amenorrhea is broad, including hypothalamic dysfunction (weight loss/anorexia), chronic anovulation (e.g. PCOS), hypothyroidism, pituitary abnormalities (tumor, empty sella), hyperprolactinemia, and ovarian insufficiency. Less common causes include Asherman’s syndrome, ovarian tumors, and non-classical congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH).

The evaluation of secondary amenorrhea should begin with a thorough history and physical examination. After excluding pregnancy, the most useful diagnostic tests are TSH, prolactin, and FSH. An abnormal TSH should prompt further testing for thyroid disease. An elevated prolactin level with normal TSH is generally followed up with an MRI to assess for pituitary tumor. Elevated FSH in women younger than 40 years of age should prompt an investigation for ovarian insufficiency, including karyotype if younger than 30 years of age.  Low or normal FSH levels would suggest further evaluation for conditions causing chronic anovulation. Laboratory evaluations (e.g. testosterone and 17-Hydroxyprogesterone) for chronic anovulation can reveal ovarian tumor or non-classic CAH.  History will generally identify potential risk factors for Asherman’s syndrome that would prompt further imaging such as hysteroscopy.

The management of secondary amenorrhea can include medical or surgical treatments, depending on the etiology. Thyroid disease requires either medical or surgical treatment, with the needs for thyroxine replacement after treatment. Pituitary tumor can be managed medically first and if that does not work, surgery or radiation therapy are indicated. Ovarian insufficiency can be treated with either CHC or hormone therapy depending on the patient needs for contraception. Hormonal contraception is the standard treatment for chronic anovulation while clomiphene citrate can help with ovulation for patients desiring fertility. Hysteroscopic resection for the treatment of Asherman’s syndrome can restore the menstrual cycle.

Further Reading:

 Initial approval 2/2015; Revised 5/2017. Reaffirmed November 2018

 

********** Notice Regarding Use ************

The Foundation for Exxcellence in Women’s Health, Inc (“Foundation”) is committed to accuracy and will review and validate all Pearls on an ongoing basis to reflect current practice.

This document is designed to aid practitioners in providing appropriate obstetric and gynecologic care. Recommendations are derived from major society guidelines and high quality evidence when available, supplemented by the opinion of the author and editorial board when necessary. It should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed.

Variations in practice may be warranted when, in the reasonable judgment of the treating clinician, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology. The Foundation reviews the articles regularly; however, its publications may not reflect the most recent evidence. While we make every effort to present accurate and reliable information, this publication is provided “as is” without any warranty of accuracy, reliability, or otherwise, either express or implied. The Foundation does not guarantee, warrant, or endorse the products or services of any firm, organization, or person. Neither the Foundation, the ABOG, SASGOG nor their respective officers, directors, members, employees, or agents will be liable for any loss, damage, or claim with respect to any liabilities, including direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages, incurred in connection with this publication or reliance on the information presented.

Copyright 2018 The Foundation for Exxcellence in Women's Health, Inc. All rights reserved.  No re-print, duplication or posting allowed without prior written consent.

 

Back to Search Results